Re: return code of _arguments

[Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bart Schaefer wrote:

> On Mar 23, 11:33pm, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> } Subject: return code of _arguments
> }
> } If my understanding is correct the test [[ $? = 300 ]] after _arguments
> } is going to be equivalent to the test [[ -n $state ]]?
> 
> I suggested getting rid of the 300 return code once before.

Hm.  We could of course add an option to _arguments to make it return
300 when needed.  Non-_arguments-wrappers would call it without the
option...


Bye
 Sven


--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx