Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Two missing completion functions that bug me
- X-seq: zsh-workers 13842
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Two missing completion functions that bug me
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:24:03 +0000
- In-reply-to: <20010329100902.61890.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20010329100902.61890.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mar 29, 11:09am, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
}
} > '-c+[create parameter or change type]' \
}
} I'm not sure you need the + after -c, or at least that is the only
} difference to my function (other than wording for the help info).
You're right; upon another attempt, none of -c, -e, nor -h need the `+'.
I was thinking it was needed to get other options to be completed in the
same word, because of:
% vared -a<TAB>
% vared -a
^cursor silently moves here
but in fact that's because -a takes an argument, not (only) because it
does not have the `+'. (Is there a way *other than* adding a ->state
machine to get other options to complete in the same word but arguments
in the next for an option like -a? I was thinking not, and in fact I
was thinking that I was one who asserted that ->state was a sufficient
solution for this, a position I'm not inclined to change.)
} Would it be worth it to try to have completions for all builtins ready
} for 4.0?
Possibly.
} I've put a (quickly generated so not ideal) list of all those
} which don't have a completion
I get the same list as you, by comparing ${(k)_comps} to ${(k)builtins}.
Arguably these don't need completions because they can't be used in an
interactive way:
compadd compdescribe compgroups compset comptry
comparguments compfiles compquote comptags compvalues
Similarly zregexparse, which although it could be used interactively,
doesn't make much sense outside _regex_arguments and is not really even
documented.
I suppose one could provide completions for them anyway, in case one is
editing a new completion function on the fly, but it seems a lot of work
for not a lot of benefit.
These don't need completions because they're keywords:
break continue
Which leaves:
: echo pushln suspend umask
[ exit pwd test zformat
bye getln r ttyctl zparseopts
dirs logout return ulimit zprof
} Any ideas what should be done for commands with just one option
} (like suspend) - completing -f might not be what people expect.
Behave as if prefix-needed is true. Complete nothing unless the `-' is
already there.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author