Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: reduce unnecessary linking

X-seq: zsh-workers 14038
From: Clint Adams <schizo@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Andrej Borsenkow <Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: reduce unnecessary linking
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 12:02:53 -0400
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.SV4.4.33.0104191951420.28844-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:55:12PM +0400
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <Pine.SV4.4.33.0104191848070.27005-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SV4.4.33.0104191951420.28844-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> And actually on my system it is very hard (near to impossible) to link
> shared module with (dynamic) library. Basically, in
> 
> cc -G -o foo.so ... -lbar
> 
> any -lbar is simply ignored. So, you cannot link zftp with -lsocket while
> omitting -lsocket for main module.

Is there a good way to test for that?

> And in any case - this optimisation should be used only for systems that
> are known to support it.

That's fair.  I'll simulate the old behavior for now.

References:
- Re: PATCH: reduce unnecessary linking
  - From: Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: PATCH: reduce unnecessary linking
  - From: Andrej Borsenkow

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author