Re: What about this? (was: RE: Zsh broken after the latest build patches)

["Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Apr 23,  6:58pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: What about this? (was: RE: Zsh broken after the latest build 
}
} > I'd have to add an argument to fetchvalue() as well [or a new PM_ flag]
} > to propagate `qt' down from paramsubst().  A new PM_ flag might not be a
} > bad idea ... any thoughts?
} 
} You mean a PM_ flag that doesn't get stored with parameters, just used when
} substituting?  It could certainly be useful.

Yes, like SCANPM_MATCHMANY and friends.

On Apr 23, 10:00pm, Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
} Subject: Re: What about this? (was: RE: Zsh broken after the latest build 
}
} I actually meant, that I cannot just use cvs update currently because it
} will reapply the patches again.

That's not true.  If you've modified your files and then do a "cvs update",
it should leave any changes that you made alone, and simply merge in any
new changes since the previous time you did "cvs update".

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net