Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Another keep-prefix problem
- X-seq: zsh-workers 14100
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Another keep-prefix problem
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 04:33:40 +0000
- In-reply-to: <200104251325.PAA03945@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <200104251325.PAA03945@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Apr 25, 3:25pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
}
} I won't commit this before I get positive replies and answers to the
} question if we then should add another possible value for the
} keep-prefix style for this new behaviour or if that's not needed (I
} can't really think of a reason for keeping the old behaviour -- put some
} people probably like it?).
I think the behavior of expanding only some of the parameter references
in a word was a bit odd to begin with, and that we should just do it the
way this patch changed it and leave it at that. I.e., no new style.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author