Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: [14172] |& broken in 4.0.1-pre-3?

X-seq: zsh-workers 14175
From: Danek Duvall <duvall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [14172] |& broken in 4.0.1-pre-3?
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:58:20 -0700
Cc: Thomas.Köhler <jean-luc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>@lorien.emufarm.org
In-reply-to: <20010430212413.A21845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from jean-luc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:24:13PM +0200
Mail-followup-to: Danek Duvall <duvall@xxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Köhler <jean-luc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20010430212413.A21845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I haven't actually looked to see what changes Bram put into 6.0ad, but he
was talking about determining if vim was attached to a terminal by checking
to see if stderr was attached to the terminal.

Each case here where the output is missing you've sent stderr somewhere
other than the terminal, and so vim figures it can't print.

There really ought to be a better way to get this information -- all three
standard fds can be redirected, but the program can still be running in a
terminal, no?

Danek

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [14172] |& broken in 4.0.1-pre-3?
  - From: Thomas Köhler

References:
- |& broken in 4.0.1-pre-3?
  - From: Thomas Köhler

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author