Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: completion for loadkeys

X-seq: zsh-workers 14213
From: Clint Adams <clint@xxxxxxx>
To: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: completion for loadkeys
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 13:45:50 -0400
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010502162301.1343.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:23:01PM +0100
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20010502120246.A27456@xxxxxxxx> <20010502162301.1343.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> I couldn't say for sure for Solaris because I'm not particularly
> familiar with loadkeys. I guess that it is only relevant on the console
> because it has no effect in my terminal window. Does Solaris definitely
> take the filename as relative to /usr/share/lib/keytables as opposed to
> the current directory - i.e will `loadkeys uk' work or do you need
> `loadkeys /usr/share/lib/keytables/uk'? The man page isn't clear and
> whatever parameter I give loadkeys, it prints absolutely nothing and
> returns 1 so I don't know.

It does.  If you tell it to load something that doesn't exist in
/usr/share/lib/keytables, it gets upset.

This is with Solaris 8, BTW.  I don't have earlier versions to
play with at the moment.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: completion for loadkeys
  - From: Oliver Kiddle

References:
- Re: PATCH: completion for loadkeys
  - From: Clint Adams
- Re: PATCH: completion for loadkeys
  - From: Oliver Kiddle

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author