Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: completion for subscript flags
- X-seq: zsh-workers 14228
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Oliver Kiddle <opk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: completion for subscript flags
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 17:28:23 -0700
- In-reply-to: <3AF333EC.7066178F@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <3AF333EC.7066178F@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On May 4, 11:57pm, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> Subject: PATCH: completion for subscript flags
>
> This adds completion for subscript flags in _subscript so as to further
> reduce the number of times I have to reach for the manual.
Very nice.
> One problem is that _values is not powerful enough to handle the
> arguments such as you have with the s flag (e.g. in $PATH[(s.:.)4]).
> Any ideas on how to handle this or is it not worth bothering?
Hmm. Something like (this is just meant as example code, not something
that would drop in anywhere):
[[ $flags = (#b)([snb])(?)(*) ]] && {
local f=$match[1] d=$match[2] r=$match[3]
[[ $r = (#b)([^$d]##)$d* ]]
}
> I'd appreciate if someone could check through my descriptions,
> particularly those for associative arrays. I have a suspicion that some
> of the flags aren't working actually but I may just be confused.
I think you've got some of the descriptions wrong. The wording gets
tricky here.
> + case ${(Pt)${compstate[parameter]}} in
> + assoc*) flags=(
> + '(R k K i I)r[return first matching value]'
> + '(r k K i I)R[return value of first matching key]'
'(R k K i I)r[return first value matched by subscript]'
'(r k K i I)R[return all values matched by subscript]'
> + '(r R K i I)k[return all values with matching keys]'
> + '(r R k i I)K[return value of first matching key]'
'(r R K i I)k[return first value where subscript matched by key]'
'(r R k i I)K[return all values where subscript matched by key]'
> + '(r R k K I)i[return first matching key]'
> + '(r R k K i)I[return all matching keys]'
These are correct, but I'd reword as:
'(r R k K I)i[return first key matched by subscript]'
'(r R k K i)I[return all keys matched by subscript]'
The difference is that r and R compare as [[ value = subscript ]] whereas
k and K do [[ subscript = key ]] and i and I do [[ key = subscript ]] --
do you see the analogy to which thing is treated as a pattern?
> + array*) flags=($flags
> + 'n[specify match to return]'
> + 'b[begin with specified element]'
> + '(r R k K i)I[reverse subscript giving index of last match]'
> + '(r k K i I)R[reverse subscripting giving last match]'
> + '(R k K i I)r[reverse subscripting giving first match]'
You seem to have forgotten
'(r R k K I)i[reverse subscript giving index of first match]'
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author