Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: zsh 4.0.1 released
- X-seq: zsh-workers 14689
- From: "E. Jay Berkenbilt" <ejb@xxxxxx>
- To: Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: zsh 4.0.1 released
- Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 00:16:41 -0400
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <Pine.SV4.4.33.0106022141001.27900-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (message from Andrej Borsenkow on Sat, 2 Jun 2001 21:42:29 +0400 (MSD))
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <Pine.SV4.4.33.0106022141001.27900-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> In which case we better call it 4.0.1a or 4.0.2. I never liked different
> tarballs of the same version. It is highly confusing.
If I may emerge from lurk mode for a moment wearing my version purist
hat, I'd strongly suggest calling 4.0.2. There's no shame in
incrementing the version number. There's a little bit of shame in
being inconsistent with the version number. There's a lot of shame in
calling two different things the by same name. There. Now I can go
back into lurk mode.
--
E. Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@xxxxxx>
http://www.ql.org/q/
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author