Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50

X-seq: zsh-workers 14695
From: Clint Adams <clint@xxxxxxx>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 15:20:53 -0400
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1010603184301.ZM30412@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 06:43:01PM +0000
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <Tc0a88d0153e106f141@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <002901c0eaa8$359841f0$21c9ca95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010601110558.A32662@xxxxxxxx> <3B1817C0.3080708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1010603184301.ZM30412@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> I suggest this because, upon further consideration, I don't want to
> require zsh developers to install autoconf 2.50.  They may need the
> older version of autoconf for other packages that have not been updated
> for the 2.50 changes.
> 
> Thoughts?

I think it's a good plan during this time when autoconf 2.50 is fresh,
but I don't think effort should be expended to maintain compatibility
with 2.13 in future.  After all, it's neither impossible nor difficult
for zsh developers to have multiple versions of autoconf on hand, should
they be required.

References:
- Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- RE: zsh and autoconf-2.50
  - From: Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50
  - From: Clint Adams
- PATCH: Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50
  - From: Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: PATCH: Re: zsh and autoconf-2.50
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author