Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
RE: Zsh 4.0.2 + 64bit Solaris 8 Forte 6.1 compiler
- X-seq: zsh-workers 15157
- From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <Tomi.Vainio@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Zsh 4.0.2 + 64bit Solaris 8 Forte 6.1 compiler
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:34:59 +0400
- Cc: <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <15162.62750.136548.435614@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
>
> Andrej Borsenkow writes:
> >
> > Yes. I do not have either Solaris or Forte compiler so I cannot do it
> > myself. As said, either describe how your compiler can be
> detected or, if it
> > is confirmed that -KPIC is supported by all compilers on
> Solaris, we can
> > change it.
> >
> I have made some digging. Oldest compiler I could find is 4.2 which
> is quite old (cc: WorkShop Compilers 4.2 30 Oct 1996 C 4.2) and all
> series 4 compilers are quite the same. This old compiler knows -KPIC
> -option and I also checked xemacs 21.4 configure and they use -KPIC
> almost for every system available (irix/sysv4/unixware/solaris).
> /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -cflags|grep -i pic
> -KPIC Compile position independent code with 32-bit addresses
> -Kpic Compile position independent code
>
So, what others think? Should we change it to -KPIC for Solaris?
>
> Next thing is how to detect 64-bit.
No. Next thing is - why should zsh default to LP64 (that is what you mean.
Zsh already supports 64-bit atithmetic and large files)? Does it fix
something or adds new features?
-andrej
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author