Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Picky criticism of ls completion list formatting
- X-seq: zsh-workers 15168
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Whaite <peta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Picky criticism of ls completion list formatting
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:50:04 +0000
- In-reply-to: <200106281621.MAA10940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <200106281621.MAA10940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jun 28, 12:21pm, Peter Whaite wrote:
} Subject: Picky criticism of ls completion list formatting
}
} Listing completions for 'ls' uses more lines because it formats using
} one less column.
}
} Mainly just curious why there is a difference.
Because zsh isn't ls. Zsh doesn't invoke ls to generate the completion
listing, it uses its own filename-generation (globbing) routines and
computes the columns itself.
Try `setopt list_packed'. If that doesn't make a difference, then there
may be something wrong with the "packing" code that we need to look at.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author