Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
RE: Zsh 4.0.2 + 64bit Solaris 8 Forte 6.1 compiler
- X-seq: zsh-workers 15181
- From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Clint Adams" <clint@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Zsh 4.0.2 + 64bit Solaris 8 Forte 6.1 compiler
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 19:09:01 +0400
- Cc: <Tomi.Vainio@xxxxxxx>, <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <20010629095154.A24508@xxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
>
> > So, what others think? Should we change it to -KPIC for Solaris?
>
> Except for gcc of course.
>
Erm ... do we need Solaris special-case? This changes it for all systems
using it.
> > No. Next thing is - why should zsh default to LP64 (that is
> what you mean.
> > Zsh already supports 64-bit atithmetic and large files)? Does it fix
> > something or adds new features?
>
> It shouldn't; it should default to the default.
>
I guess, yes. Especially as with this patch it is enough to just say
CC='cc -xarch-sparcv9'; no need to set individual flags.
-andrej
Index: zshconfig.ac
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/zsh/zsh/zshconfig.ac,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.10 zshconfig.ac
--- zshconfig.ac 2001/06/29 14:59:42 1.10
+++ zshconfig.ac 2001/06/29 15:04:13
@@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@
case "$host_os" in
hpux*) DLCFLAGS="${DLCFLAGS=+z}" ;;
sunos*) DLCFLAGS="${DLCFLAGS=-pic}" ;;
- solaris*|sysv4*|esix*) DLCFLAGS="${DLCFLAGS=-Kpic}" ;;
+ solaris*|sysv4*|esix*) DLCFLAGS="${DLCFLAGS=-KPIC}" ;;
esac
fi
case "$host_os" in
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author