Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: A couple of problems with version 4.0.2
- X-seq: zsh-workers 15423
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>, Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado <dervishd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: A couple of problems with version 4.0.2
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:07:38 +0000
- In-reply-to: <001c01c1105f$c20835a0$21c9ca95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <001c01c1105f$c20835a0$21c9ca95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jul 19, 6:33pm, Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
} Subject: RE: A couple of problems with version 4.0.2
}
} > The last is just a suggestion: I want to use zsh instead of ash
} > in a special linux bootdisk we have at work, but the maintainer of
} > that disk has said to me that the editing keybindings in zsh cannot
} > be removed and that they occupy a lot.
}
} Strictly speaking, they are autoloaded if zsh runs interactive. But if
} corresponding modules do not exist, zsh will run without. What I do not
} like is error message:
}
} bor@itsrm2% zsh -f
} zsh: failed to load module: zsh/zle
If you compile zsh without the zle module, rather than compiling it with
and then removing the dynamic library, you don't get any complaint.
} I do not know if it possible to put zsh on a floppy. On my system (not a
} ix86 and with debugging):
}
} bor@itsrm2% size =zsh
} /tools/bin/zsh: 796300 + 58864 + 2525272 = 3380436
A static link, with ONLY the zsh/main module, stripped but compiled with
-g (so non-optimized code):
text data bss dec hex filename
448879 12576 66808 528263 80f87 Src/zsh
That's still about 1/3 of the available space on a floppy.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author