Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: problems with #compdef
- X-seq: zsh-workers 15644
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: problems with #compdef
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:06:25 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20010816135151.B20118@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20010815161518.A14385@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1010815161937.ZM10338@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010816135151.B20118@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Adam Spiers wrote:
> ...
>
> Well I ran compdump, which I thought was equivalent, but evidently
> not, because removing it does indeed work. Thanks a lot. So why
> isn't compdump sufficient?
Because compdump only dumps the current state, it doesn't re-examine
the files. This is so that one can change things by executing compdef
commands on the command line and then call compdump without having
that overwritten by compdump preferring the things in the files.
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author