Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Shell exits on bad coproc redirection
- X-seq: zsh-workers 15658
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: Shell exits on bad coproc redirection
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 16:34:00 +0000
- In-reply-to: <2306.998064324@xxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <2306.998064324@xxxxxxx>
On Aug 17, 5:05pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: Shell exits on bad coproc redirection
}
} > Sun May 18 18:57:08 1997 Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
} >
} > Do not handle SIGPIPE specially for shells with job control
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[">" now quotes something different]
} > paranoia. The issue was that if a `tee' spawned by a multio exits early,
} > the parent shell will get SIGPIPE and exit, too; but that's probably not a
} > bug.
}
} Multios and coprocs are pretty similar in this respect. I'm not
} particularly attached to `probably not a bug'; I would probably trade it in
} for `seems to reflect the current intention of the code' in return for a go
} on your playstation.
If we were talking about a shell script, I'd be completely in agreement.
But Zoltan's log entry is talking about shells with job control. Why
should an interactive shell ever exit on SIGPIPE?
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author