Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: differences between the two branches
- X-seq: zsh-workers 16025
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: differences between the two branches
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:45:32 +0000
- In-reply-to: <3BC6F270.85671F06@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <3BC6F270.85671F06@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Oct 12, 2:38pm, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
}
} To be honest I must have missed the suggestion of keeping the ChangeLog
} entries the same in both branches when you first mentioned it. Do you
} include the lines with the dates and full ordering in that?
Yes; if you include the same date lines, diff tends to sync up between the
entries, in which case a
} few messy things like the last completion change where I excluded the
} _wget changes from the stable branch but included the rest
are easy to see, rather than getting lost in large swaths of "+" or "-"
lines in the diff output. At least, it works more of the time than it
does if the entries are differently dated/ordered.
} Anyway to make this task easier, I passed both ChangeLogs through a bit
} of sed to extract just the entries, wrapped onto one line each.
Hmm, a bit of perl could probably help here. It should be possible to
gobble up the entries to sort them by article number without actually
unfolding them. I might fiddle with that later.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author