Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Buglette & Fix for checkrmall in 4.0.2

X-seq: zsh-workers 16060
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Buglette & Fix for checkrmall in 4.0.2
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:30:54 -0700
In-reply-to: <1003169603.2222.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <8465.1003165637@xxxxxxx> <1003169603.2222.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Oct 15, 10:13pm, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> Subject: Re: Buglette & Fix for checkrmall in 4.0.2
> On ðÎÄ, 2001-10-15 at 21:07, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> > Bart Schaefer wrote:
> > > This raises the question of whether a backgrounded subshell should still
> > > have the INTERACTIVE option set.
> 
> I have very vague recollection that I complained about this once and
> somebody (Bart? Peter?) gave me valid reasons why it should not be
> unset. But may be it was another option,

There are reasons to leave interactive set in a subshell.  I'm not sure
there are reasons to leave it set in a *backgrounded* subshell.  Perhaps
it's too difficult to tell whether a subshell is being backgrounded?

References:
- Re: Buglette & Fix for checkrmall in 4.0.2
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: Buglette & Fix for checkrmall in 4.0.2
  - From: Borsenkow Andrej

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author