Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Additional differences between the two branches
- X-seq: zsh-workers 16072
- From: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Additional differences between the two branches
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 11:13:07 +0100
- In-reply-to: <1011016174144.ZM2804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 05:41:44PM +0000
- Mail-followup-to: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <1011016170817.ZM2406@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1011016174144.ZM2804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Bart Schaefer (schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> I found a bug in the difflog.pl script when there were repeated entries
> for the same article number (e.g. 15060). Here are additional differences
> in the "unposted" changes, revealed by re-running the fixed script; I've
> edited a bit to remove obviously irrelevant parts.
>
> I've actually already committed this one, though not yet logged it:
>
> +2001-08-15 Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> + * unposted: Doc/Zsh/expn.yo: mention the word `greedy' in the
> + docs for the S flag, to make it easier to find for those used to
> + Perl-speak.
Ah, I wondered why mine weren't appearing. Thanks.
> +2001-08-17 Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> + * unposted: Functions/Prompts/prompt_adam2_setup: eliminate
> + horrible inefficiencies resulting from avoidable fork()s
>
> +2001-08-15 Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> + * unposted: Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo: add missing docs for cache-policy
> + style.
Those would both be perfectly safe to go across, although I think I
missed the thread where it was decided what the role of the two
branches should be.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author