Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: zrecompile not verbose enough on failure?

X-seq: zsh-workers 16106
From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: zrecompile not verbose enough on failure?
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:29:42 +0200
In-reply-to: <1011022015957.ZM15484@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20011021214251.A31530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1011022015957.ZM15484@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Bart Schaefer wrote:

> On Oct 21,  9:42pm, Adam Spiers wrote:
> }
> } Why does zrecompile redirect STDERR to /dev/null when running
> } zcompile?
> 
> Probably to suppress warning-only messages like
> 
> 	zcompile: functions will use zsh style autoloading
> 
> because zrecompile is intended to run unobtrusively from a .zshrc or the
> like; but I agree that it would be nice to see more of the *real* failure
> messages from zcompile.

Should we make it depend on the -q option?


Bye
  Sven

-- 
Sven Wischnowsky                    wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- zrecompile not verbose enough on failure?
  - From: Adam Spiers
- Re: zrecompile not verbose enough on failure?
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author