Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: ChangeLog formatting?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 16160
- From: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: ChangeLog formatting?
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:25:59 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20011024100226.B25268@xxxxxxxx>; from clint@xxxxxxx on Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 10:02:26AM -0400
- Mail-followup-to: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110231358210.31301-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <011023170532.ZM19347@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20011024100226.B25268@xxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Clint Adams (clint@xxxxxxx) wrote:
> I like "article number: short description", and I prefer to commit all
> files at once. Thus the ChangeLog entry, the cvs log entry, and the
> diffs all correspond to the patch posted to the mailing list.
That gets my vote. Related changes are best committed atomically,
IMHO.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author