Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: _mozilla

X-seq: zsh-workers 16331
From: Clint Adams <clint@xxxxxxx>
To: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: _mozilla
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:47:17 -0500
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3C173ACF.6514923D@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20011211200638.GA6525@xxxxxxxx> <3C173ACF.6514923D@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> Isn't most of this the same as _netscape. And if _netscape was updated
> for netscape 6.2 would there be any difference at all between them?

I don't know; I tried Netscape 6 for Solaris, and it was very unstable.
I have not used Netscape since.

> What I'd suggest is that we don't have a separate _mozilla but merge
> these changes into _netscape. Should we still be supporting netscape 4
> in _netscape at all? If so we can probably just look for the
> user-preference directory (.netscape or .netscape6) to decide quickly
> which set of options to complete.

I'd wager that the majority of Netscape users are still on 4.

> Does mozilla still accept all the GTK options? We probably need an
> _gtk_arguments function really.

Yes, it does.  I didn't add it because I had no idea what it was all
about.

References:
- PATCH: _mozilla
  - From: Clint Adams
- Re: PATCH: _mozilla
  - From: Oliver Kiddle

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author