Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Maybe a bug?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 16392
- From: Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado <raul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: raul@xxxxxxxxxxxx, zefram@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Maybe a bug?
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:08:52 +0100
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- Reply-to: Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado <raul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado <raul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi again, Zefram :)
>>kernel times are not 0. The elapsed time should be, at least, the sum
>>of user and kernel time, shouldn't it?.
>Strictly speaking no; on a multi-processor system
Yes, I forgot O:))) I'm not very accostumed to SMP boxes ;)
>>It should return 0, not 18887% as it uses.
>Obviously the elapsed time is not zero in this case, it's just too
>small to show as non-zero in the output format we use.
Yes, it's true. But the percentage is bad anyway :??
>-- it can be correct to show more than 100% CPU usage (if the program
>averaged using more than one CPU at a time).
Yes again... Well, anyway I use 'GNU time' most of the time when
doing statistics for my programs, and then the number matters. I'll
use the builtin time for general use (sometimes I want to profile
shell functions, and the builtin time is better for that).
Thanks a lot for your help. I'm really falling in love with zsh
every second I use it :))) Far better than Bash, IMHO. Without the
ugly readline, the amazing completion system, etc... I'm afraid I
won't be able to learn all its capabilities in this life ;))
Raúl
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author