Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Bad expansion
- X-seq: zsh-workers 16477
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: DervishD <raul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Bad expansion
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:31:16 -0800
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <E16SkJ9-0001G9-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <E16SkJ9-0001G9-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E16SkOJ-0001Gu-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jan 21, 8:40pm, DervishD wrote:
>
> >> # Bad substitution
> >> echo ${${testing[1]}_VALUE}
> >echo ${(e):-\$${testing[1]}_VALUE}
> >The :-\ is a smiley that means "maybe there ought to be a neater way".
>
> Are you joking?
Yes, he is.
> "Expand <NULL> identifier, and, if it is not defined or missing
> (which is true), expand the other thing, that is, \$${testing[1]}_VALUE"
Almost. You forgot about the (e). The whole expression means:
Expand the unnamed identifier, and, if it is not defined or has an empty
value (which is true), insert \$${testing[1]}_VALUE instead; then perform
parameter expansion, command substitution and arithmetic expansion on the
result.
"The result" is of course a `$' (from `\$') followed by the value of the
${testing[1]} expansion, followed by `_VALUE'. So if ${testing[1]} is,
for example, `foo', then "the result" is `$foo_VALUE', which is parameter-
expanded because of (e), and gives you what you want.
Using (P) instead of (e) allows you to leave off the `\$', because (P)
means "interpret the result as a parameter name and use the value of
that parameter." However, with (P), you have to use an extra level of
${...}, because (P) takes effect at a different time in the expansion
process than (e) does.
On Jan 21, 8:46pm, DervishD wrote:
>
> Seriously: why am I having the 'bad substitution' error? What am
> I doing wrong?. This interest me more than the solution.
Anything that looks like ${${...}} is called a "nested substitution". The
stuff inside the outermost ${...} can take one of two forms:
(1) it can be the name of a parameter (in which case the substitution is
not nested, of course), plus an optional [...] subscript;
(2) it can be another ${...} substitution expression plus an optional
subscript.
That's all; nothing else. In ${${testing[1]}_VALUE}, the `_VALUE' part
is neither part of the inner ${...} substitution, nor is it a subscript,
so it can't be there. In ${:-${testing[1]}_VALUE}, the `_VALUE' becomes
part of the outer ${...}, so then it's OK.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author