Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: Re: insert-last-word/copy-prev-word/... question
- X-seq: zsh-workers 16772
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: insert-last-word/copy-prev-word/... question
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 18:21:11 +0000
- In-reply-to: <21415.1015339730@xxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <21415.1015339730@xxxxxxx>
On Mar 5, 2:48pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
}
} + * If we have two arguments, the second is the position of
} + * the word to extract, 1..N. The default is to use the
} + * numeric argument, or the last word if that is not set.
Doesn't this conflict with what the numeric argument used to mean?
I think this whole thing could have been written as a shell widget
without resorting to modifying insert-last-word. I just haven't had
a lot of time to think about it yet.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author