Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: zrecompile not verbose enough on failure?

X-seq: zsh-workers 16777
From: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: zrecompile not verbose enough on failure?
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:43:28 +0000
In-reply-to: <15495.9356.955445.827550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from wischnow@xxxxxxxxx on Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 09:27:56AM +0100
Mail-followup-to: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20011021214251.A31530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1011022015957.ZM15484@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <15316.806.28762.457890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020306144310.A21102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <15495.9356.955445.827550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: "Adam Spiers,,07775562717,020 88 30 30 35" <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sven Wischnowsky (wischnow@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> So, here is my suggestion.  Message printing gets a bit confused in
> case of errors from zcompile, but personally, I don't care too much.

It's good enough for me too.  Thanks!

References:
- Re: zrecompile not verbose enough on failure?
  - From: Adam Spiers
- Re: zrecompile not verbose enough on failure?
  - From: Sven Wischnowsky

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author