Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: 4.0.5 ?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 17007
- From: Borsenkow Andrej <Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 4.0.5 ?
- Date: 17 Apr 2002 21:46:59 +0400
- In-reply-to: <1020417172407.ZM13112@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <29238.1019041000@xxxxxxx> <000c01c1e615$2ca99ee0$1fc1f2a3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1020417172407.ZM13112@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
В Срд, 17.04.2002, в 21:24, Bart Schaefer написал:
> There are entries for 229 article numbers (not necessarily 229 log
> entries) in the dev ChangeLog that do not appear in the branch log.
> (How many do there need to be before we declare 4.2? :-)
>
IMHO there can be no 4.2 unless module dependency problem is fixed
(dynamic modules that depend on other dynamic modules).
To remind - it is impossible to dlopen() a shared object that has
unresolved data objects even on Linux, that currently rules out any
solution that encodes dependencies in binary itself.
Two possible solutions are
- major rewrite that will eliminate external variables completely. It
may even make code cleaner and create basis for some interesting things
(line multiple ZLE instances) as example
- adding external files that are installed together with binary shared
object and describe dependencies for Zsh.
-andrej
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author