Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: more selection

X-seq: zsh-workers 17202
From: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: more selection
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 13:48:32 +0100
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <29266.1021980087@xxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <21560.1021303981@xxxxxxx> <29266.1021980087@xxxxxxx>
Sender: Oliver Kiddle <kiddleo@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 12:21:27PM +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote:

> only with zle -F, so that part could be done without the module if we
> implemented the bash version of `read -t <timeout>'.  It's annoying I
> picked that letter for polling.)

If the timeout is considered to be an optional argument, is there
really any conflict there? The timeout defaulting to zero would 
give exactly the same as current behaviour so it could be compatible
with both older zsh and bash/ksh93. right?

Oliver

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only.  It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege.  It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party.  If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender.  Thank you.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: more selection
  - From: Peter Stephenson

References:
- PATCH: more selection
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: PATCH: more selection
  - From: Peter Stephenson

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author