Re: unzip and _path_files interaction

[Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxx>]

Bart Schaefer wrote:

> ...
> 
> I think (z) should keep working the way it does, or at least we need
> somthing that does work the way it now does.  So for the time being I'd
> go with the second patch.

I was feeling the same way...


Bye
  Sven

Index: Completion/Unix/Type/_path_files
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/zsh/zsh/Completion/Unix/Type/_path_files,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.17 _path_files
--- Completion/Unix/Type/_path_files	21 May 2002 07:35:34 -0000	1.17
+++ Completion/Unix/Type/_path_files	29 May 2002 15:03:36 -0000
@@ -23,9 +23,11 @@
 (( $tmp1[(I)-[/g]*] )) && haspats=yes
 (( $tmp1[(I)-g*] )) && gopt=yes
 if (( $tmp1[(I)-/] )); then
-  pats=( '*(-/)' ${(z)${(M)tmp1:#-g*}#-g} )
+  pats="${(@)${(@M)tmp1:#-g*}#-g}"
+  pats=( '*(-/)' ${${(z):-x $pats}[2,-1]} )
 else
-  pats=( "${(@z)${(@M)tmp1:#-g*}#-g}" )
+  pats="${(@)${(@M)tmp1:#-g*}#-g}"
+  pats=( ${${(z):-x $pats}[2,-1]} )
 fi
 pats=( "${(@)pats:# #}" )
 

-- 
Sven Wischnowsky                          wischnow@xxxxxxxxx