Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: 64bit Zsh for Solaris?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 17428
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 64bit Zsh for Solaris?
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 09:38:47 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20020705171103.R4809@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20020705112635.A19854@xxxxxxxxxxx> <15653.16318.328406.362448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020705171103.R4809@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Greg Price wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 09:42:06AM +0300, Tomi Vainio - Sun Finland - wrote:
> > Greg Price writes:
> > >
> > > My problem is that I need a 64 bit version (i.e. compiled to produce a 64
> > > bit binary) for Solaris. I've tried both the Sun compiler (which I would
> > > prefer to use) and the GNU C compiler; zsh compiles fine, but it fails a
> > > number of the tests in the test suite.
> > >
> > As said before you don't really need 64bit binary but you can do it if
> > you like.
> >
> > file /usr/local/bin/zsh
> > /usr/local/bin/zsh: ELF 64-bit MSB executable SPARCV9 Version 1, dynamically linked, stripped
> >
> > Here is what I did with zsh 4.0.4
> > CC=cc ./configure --enable-cflags='-xO4 -xarch=v9' --enable-ldflags='-xO4 -xarch=v9'
>
> Yep, tried that - did "make check" pass all the tests? Mine fails tests:
> A04, D01, D02, D03, E02.
Without more iformation (output) we can't tell you much about this.
But unless we introduced problems in the last couple of months, zsh
can be compiled on a LP64 architecture. In fact, most of my part of the
development from 3.0.x to 4.0 was done on a Dec Alpha (LP64, too, of
course, like every decent 64 Bit architecture).
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author