Re: PATCH: my "SECONDS can be floating point" tweaks

[Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>]

Wayne Davison wrote:
> Here's a fairly simple patch that I think improves things a bit.

Looks OK, although I still vaguely think a struct timeval is more
appropriate for the raw values (which doesn't fit inside struct param).
If you're convinced an overflow is unlikely, I don't really care,
though.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>                  Software Engineer
CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070


**********************************************************************
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. 
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by 
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited.  
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and 
delete the material from any computer.
**********************************************************************