Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Cant fg a suspended su (4.1.0-dev-7)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 18304
- From: Philippe Troin <phil@xxxxxxxx>
- To: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Cant fg a suspended su (4.1.0-dev-7)
- Date: 26 Feb 2003 12:30:18 -0800
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1030226162557.ZM25106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <200302211807.h1LI74n23531@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87r89v7ef3.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1030226162557.ZM25106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: Philippe Troin <phil@xxxxxxxx>
"Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Feb 25, 10:18pm, Philippe Troin wrote:
> }
> } While I was perusing bash's sources, I found out that we could
> } also improve pgid handling when doing builtin_exec(). On the way
> } too...
>
> Is anybody else a bit leery of actually copying code from the bash
> sources?
>
> Zsh is not GPL'd and I don't want it to become so.
Who said I was copying code from bash? I just mentionned I was looking
how bash was behaving and how its behavior was implemented. By doing
this I found out that we did one thing wrong w.r.t. exec. That's all.
BTW, I found out that bash has a couple of problems when dealing with
the same case. I obviously do not want zsh to have the same problems.
I don't believe that checking out how a given feature is implemented
in a GPL'ed program counts as "copying code" or "infecting zsh with
GPL" or whatever.
Tell me if I'm wrong.
Phil.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author