Re: PATCH: RLIMITS macros

[Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>]

"Bart Schaefer" wrote:
> checking if RLIMIT_VMEM and RLIMIT_RSS are the same... no
> checking if RLIMIT_VMEM and RLIMIT_AS are the same... no
> 
> gcc -c -I. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -
> Wmissing-prototypes -ggdb  -o rlimits.o
> ../../../zsh-4.0/Src/Builtins/rlimits.c
> ../../../zsh-4.0/Src/Builtins/rlimits.c: In function `printulimit':
> ../../../zsh-4.0/Src/Builtins/rlimits.c:219: duplicate case value
> ../../../zsh-4.0/Src/Builtins/rlimits.c:207: this is the first entry for that
>  value
> make[3]: *** [rlimits.o] Error 1

Does that mean RLIMIT_AS and RLIMIT_VMEM aren't actually definitions at
all?  That's the only conclusion I can see.  Presumably it's necessary
to test compilation with RLIMIT_VMEM, RLIMIT_RSS, RLIMIT_AS, use
these to define HAVE_RLIMIT_VMEM, HAVE_RLIMIT_RSS, HAVE_RLIMIT_AS, and
replace the #ifdef's in the configure tests with those.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>                  Software Engineer
CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070


**********************************************************************
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. 
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by 
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited.  
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and 
delete the material from any computer.
**********************************************************************