Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Bug#190948: Violation against The Single UNIX ® Specification, Version 2
- X-seq: zsh-workers 18532
- From: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Bug#190948: Violation against The Single UNIX ® Specification, Version 2
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 13:07:03 +0200
- Cc: Juhapekka Tolvanen <juhtolv@xxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20030427130703.GB12714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20030427130703.GB12714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 27 Apr, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xcu/chap2.html#tag_001_014_011
>
> juhtolv@heresy:/home/juhtolv % set -o vi
> set: no such option: vi
Being an interactive related feature, this isn't so critical but it would
be better if we can handle this. Adding a special case in bin_set()
instead of actually adding an option might perhaps be sufficient to
satisfy the specification. However, on the basis that zle is a separate
module and may not even be loaded and you can't just call selectkeymap(),
I have no idea how to get this to work. And which keymap should set +o
vi select?
Oliver
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author