Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Completion in pwd before subdirecories
- X-seq: zsh-workers 19289
- From: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Completion in pwd before subdirecories
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:56:04 +0100
- In-reply-to: <1031215170258.ZM12804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20031213154651.GR18859@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1031213191918.ZM5325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031213233905.GW18859@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3213.1071488991@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1031215170258.ZM12804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Bart wrote:
> On Dec 15, 12:49pm, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> }
> } zstyle ':completion:*' file-patterns \
> } '*(-/):directories %p(^-/):globbed-files' '*:all-files'
> }
> } Unfortunately, that will now break for any completion which specifies a
> } glob qualifier such as _chown.
>
> Are you sure about that?
No. Sorry, didn't test it so based on what you say below, I'm probably
wrong.
> There's code in _files to attempt to merge together any trailing stuff
> that looks like glob qualifiers, because _files predates the #q flag.
> In fact, I'm suspicious that adding #q might actually break things.
I'll have to test. I seem to remember it not working once in the past.
> } I'm not quite sure whether the default file-patterns style shouldn't
> } use %p(^-/) for globbed-files anyway.
>
> I don't think I understand the question.
For that you need to look back at the original question on -users and
look at why the file-patterns style above was needed. Patterns like *
match directories so the directories were completed twice. This meant
the directory got completed in the globbed-files group before the
directories group was reached. Working out that the file-patterns style
is needed and why is not obvious. So I wondered whether the default
file-patterns style shouldn't be this.
> Are you suggesting that we should split the existing globbed-files default
> into globbed-files and globbed-directories? I.e., so that instead of the
I wasn't suggesting that but it is an idea that may be worth thinking
about.
> } What if we want to glob directory names from a completion function?
>
> I'm not making the connection between that question and the previous one.
>
> However, nothing stops any completion function from doing something like
>
> zstyle -m ":completion:${curcontext}:" file-patterns '*' ||
> zstyle ":completion:${curcontext}:" file-patterns \
> '%p(-/):directories %p(^-/):globbed-files' '*:all-files'
>
Doing that from every completion function which just wants to glob for
a certain file extension is not pleasant.
It has never seemed ideal to me that, for example, gunzip completion
will complete a directory called dir.gz even if the user has
directories after files in their file-patterns style. Ideally we should
tidy things up from the completion functions and not expect user's to
set the file-patterns style for every command.
For the majority of commands we use something like _files -g '*.gz' to
specify a filename extension. These should ideally not match
directories. For some commands like chown, we use a more complex glob
where it is valid to match directories (though some user's may still
want directory completion deferred).
One option might be for _files to add the (^-/) when substituting
%p and to add a -/g option to suppress this when the glob should also
match directories. We could even have other escapes in addition to %p
which give the user more control. A user who relies on _next_tags to
get at directories may want explicitly globbed directories first for
commands like chown.
Oliver
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author