Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Change in glibc's strncmp -> segfault?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 19385
- From: Bob Schmertz <rschmertz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Change in glibc's strncmp -> segfault?
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 01:24:48 -0800 (PST)
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- Reply-to: robert.schmertz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
I man page for strcmp on my Linux system, and it doesn't say anything
about the behavior of strcmp or stsrncmp when null pointers are passed.
But sometimes you call add_match_part explicitly with NULL parameters for
the first six params. Two of these are immediately passed into a strncmp
call.
I upgraded my glibc on my Gentoo box in the last day or two to 2.3.2-r9.
Unfortunately, I don't know what version I had before. From around that
time, I started getting crashes when I would tab-complete a directory
name. I made it whole again by changing line 344 in compmatch.c
(downloaded v. 4.1.1 today) from
if (!strncmp(l, w, wl))
to
if (l && !strncmp(l, w, wl))
I suppose it should really be (l && w && !strncmp(...)), on the chance
that there is somewhere that you are calling add_match_part with a null w
but a non-null l, but this fixed my immediate problem. I have no idea if
this solution is "correct", but I hope at least I have pointed out the
right problem.
=====
Cheers,
Bob Schmertz
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author