Re: redo of 16845

[Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>]

Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> Peter wrote:
> > 
> > We probably ought to leave this for 4.2.1, now (that doesn't need to
> > be quite as delayed as 4.2.0 was).  There's no point risking breaking
> > the make system somewhere at this point.
> 
> Should we perhaps pull the pcre module from 4.2.0 then? Though having
> zsh linked against a library in /usr won't affect most users, it'll be
> bad for anyone who is affected.

Mentioning it in the installation notes should be good enough, since
you can just set `link=no auto=no' in config.modules to avoid the
problem completely.  (Alternatively, we could set link=no in pcre.mdd.)
Either of these should avoid the need to remove it.

If somebody would like to compose the text indicating the problem...

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>                  Software Engineer
CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070


**********************************************************************
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. 
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by 
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited. 
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and 
delete the material from any computer.
**********************************************************************