Re: [frederik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Bug#236748: zsh: associative array documentation reference broken]

[Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mar 8, 10:23am, Clint Adams wrote:
}
}  For associative arrays, `[*]' or `[@]' evaluate to all the values
}  (not the keys, but see Subscript Flags below), in no particular
}  order.
} 
} There is nothing relevant to this syntax under Subscript Flags.

Yes, there is.  The k, K, and e subscript flags all affect the
intepretation of * and @.  It's true that [(K)*] is nearly the same
as [*], but [(k)*] is quite different, as both [(k)@] and [(K)@] are
from [@].

}  For associative arrays, `[*]' or `[@]' evaluate to all the values
}  (not the keys, but see the documentation for the 'k' flag under
}  Parameter Expansion Flags in zshexpn(1)), in no particular order.

No, this is NOT what it should say, or at least not ALL that it should
say.