Re: memory leaks report

[Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>]

Felix Rosencrantz wrote:
> This is an old leak
> 68 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 8 of 19
>    at  malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:153)
>    by  zshcalloc (mem.c:508)
>    by  newhashtable (hashtable.c:99)
>    by  ???
>    by  ???
>    by  dyn_boot_module (module.c:625)
>    by  boot_module (module.c:677)
>    by  load_module (module.c:784)
>    by  require_module (module.c:889)
>    by  bin_zmodload_load (module.c:1615)

I had a go at this last one before, but there's not enough information,
so I had to guess.  Some module initialisation function is initialising
a hash table; the obvious one is zsh/parameter, but there was no obvious
sign of a leak there.

A test wehre every module is loaded sparately by hand with `zmodload
zsh/...' should be able to pick up which it is.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>                  Software Engineer
CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************