Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: (F) note
- X-seq: zsh-workers 19730
- From: Wayne Davison <wayned@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: PATCH: (F) note
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 09:07:51 -0700
- Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <12254.1081171579@xxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <12254.1081171579@xxxxxxx>
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 02:26:19PM +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> +`full' (i.e. non-empty) directories. Note that the
> +opposite sense tt(LPAR()^F)tt(RPAR()) gives files which are
> +either empty, or not directories. Use tt(LPAR()/^F)tt(RPAR()) for
> +empty directories
This sentence makes it sound like zsh is checking for zero-length files.
How about this wording:
... Note that the
opposite sense tt(LPAR()^F)tt(RPAR()) results in both
empty directories and non-directories. Use tt(LPAR()/^F)tt(RPAR())
for just empty directories.
..wayne..
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author