Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: Re: Compsys and KSH_AUTOLOAD
- X-seq: zsh-workers 19799
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: Compsys and KSH_AUTOLOAD
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 04:11:56 +0000
- In-reply-to: <4175.1082369917@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <1040410174430.ZM10891@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1170.1081778412@athlon> <040412085942.ZM19035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3571.1081806187@athlon> <1040413053826.ZM20012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <18035.1081870188@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1040413175111.ZM21011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <13987.1082134179@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1040416173016.ZM1145@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <11049.1082231519@athlon> <1040419001434.ZM9151@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4175.1082369917@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Apr 19, 12:18pm, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
}
} declare not accepting -m goes back to before the mailing list archives
} so unless you have older archives, it won't be easy to find out.
I have zsh source dating back to 1993, before I even knew there *was* a
"declare" command, but it's there, and doesn't have -m.
{"declare", bin_typeset, 0, -1, BINF_TYPEOPTS, 0, "LRZfilrtux", NULL},
} My suspicion is that it was an oversight when -m was added but it may
} have been bash compatibility.
I suspect the latter: For source that old, it's almost all Paul's code,
and I suspect he implemented it as nearly as possible the way bash does.
} So I really don't see much harm in adding -m to declare's options.
} Or do you disagree?
No, I don't see any harm. I think that means you should reverse the
sense of the test rather than remove the test, though.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author