Re: PATCH: exit after 10 EOF's

[Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>]

Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> 
> > I haven't gotten to the latter part yet, but here's a patch that (a) backs 
> > out 20363 and (b) causes the count to apply to printing of the warning.
> 
> Actually I just noticed that it doesn't _completely_ back out 20363.  This
> part of 20363 is still there:

That's the chunk from 20300.  It's the change that fixes the problem
that after a ^D and two ^C's (without ignore_eof) the shell exits.
There's no reason to remove that.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>                  Software Engineer
CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************