Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: More POSIX developments
- X-seq: zsh-workers 20520
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: More POSIX developments
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <200410041023.i94ANvFc011725@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0409241908380.1714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200409271104.i8RB4URU009112@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410021419240.25270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200410041023.i94ANvFc011725@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> Yes, the more I think about it the less likely it is that someone using
> "test" or "[" syntax wants anything other than standard-compliant
> behaviour.
Just to keep things entertaining, this discusson was just revived on the
austin-group list, and Geoff Clare is arguing in favor of permitting the
extension ...
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author