Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Bug#303278: zsh: completions for gv are for pre 3.6
- X-seq: zsh-workers 21098
- From: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx, 303278-forwarded@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Bug#303278: zsh: completions for gv are for pre 3.6
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:27:00 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20050405190616.GA24705@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <E1DIsyg-0002EX-S2@soup> <20050405190616.GA24705@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Clint wrote:
> > The completion for gv (functions/Completion/X/_gv) uses the pre-3.6
> > single dash command line arguments rather than the new POSIX-like
Aren't two dashes a GNU thing, not POSIX?
> > syntax used (with two dashes) in 3.6. The easiest way to detect
>
> Is it worth it to check which version of gv is in use?
Probably not.
In general we've never tried to support old versions of software except
where the old version continues to be widely distributed (such as if
Solaris comes with an old version).
Any reason for removing gview from the commands it completes? Is that a
Gnome variant of gv? We probably should complete postscript files for
kghostview too.
Oliver
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author