Re: LONG_LIST_JOBS doesn't affect all job listings?

[Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>]

Bart Schaefer wrote:
> I just noticed that "setopt long_list_jobs" doesn't have any effect except
> for asynchronous job notifications; e.g. when a background job exits or is
> signalled you get long format, but when a foreground job is stopped you do
> not.
> 
> Shouldn't it also affect the output of "jobs", "bg", "fg", etc.?  There's
> some room to argue that "jobs" has the -l option, but "bg" and "fg" don't.
> 
> It *does* appear to affect the output of "wait".

I would certainly have said bg and fg should work like job
notifications, at least.

Is this connected with users/8989?  The messages seem to be generally
rather inconsistent.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>                  Software Engineer
CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road
Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

**********************************************************************