Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: printf bug(s?)

X-seq: zsh-workers 21367
From: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: printf bug(s?)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:19:36 +0200
In-reply-to: <1050617154719.ZM12697@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <42B2203B.3060602@xxxxxxxxxx> <8037.1118996107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42B2CE98.8070905@xxxxxxxxxx> <fb6be96e05061706483b30e32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1050617154719.ZM12697@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 17 Jun, Bart wrote:
> Is the printf builtin (or shell utility) specified by POSIX?  If so,
> this may be a reasonable question for austin-group interpretation.

It is specified by POSIX:
  http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/printf.html

I don't subscribe to the austin-group lists so if you do get any
interpretation there, let us know the results.

Oliver

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.

References:
- printf bug(s?)
  - From: Harald van Dĳk
- Re: printf bug(s?)
  - From: Oliver Kiddle
- Re: printf bug(s?)
  - From: Harald van Dĳk
- Re: printf bug(s?)
  - From: J
- Re: printf bug(s?)
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author