Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: xtrace scope

X-seq: zsh-workers 21543
From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xtrace scope
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:38:16 +0100
In-reply-to: <20050728152656.GA30070@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20050728152656.GA30070@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Clint Adams wrote:
> Is there rationale for having XTRACE be local to functions?

This feature long predates LOCAL_OPTIONS and I kept it as a special
case when I added that just for compatibility.  I don't think there's
any standardisation requirement.

pws


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

**********************************************************************

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xtrace scope
  - From: Clint Adams

References:
- xtrace scope
  - From: Clint Adams

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author