Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: multibyte FAQ (MacOS X)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 22092
- From: "Jun T." <takimoto-j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: multibyte FAQ (MacOS X)
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:14:19 +0900
- In-reply-to: <200512141831.jBEIV3qQ028002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <200512141831.jBEIV3qQ028002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I'm just a user (not a worker) of zsh but want to comment on the mulibyte support on MacOS X.
At 18:31 +0000 05.12.14, Peter Stephenson wrote:
>+multibyte mode is believed to work automatically on:
>+
>+ - All(?) current GNU/Linux distributions
>+ - All(?) current BSD variants
>+ - OS X 10.4.3
In MacOS X, configure does not enable multibyte by default, because __STDC_ISO_10646__ is not defined. So "./configure; make" gives a zsh without multibyte support, although it supports "\u....".
If configured with --enable-mulibyte, then I get a zsh which supports multibyte relatively well, but at least two problems remain;
(1) "\u...." (and so insert-composed-char and insert-unicode-char) doesn't work. This can be fixed by a patch proposed in 22085.
(2) In MacOS X, the standard file system is HFS+ which stores filenames in Unicode but in fully decomposed form. This means the filename returned by the completion is also in decomposed form; the filename is displayed correctly, but it can't be edited correctly. And if I go up/down in the history stack the prompt is destroyed.
I can test only on 10.4.3 but guess the situation is the same in 10.3.x/10.4.x.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author