Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: bug in completion/expansion of files with LANG=C
- X-seq: zsh-workers 22139
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: bug in completion/expansion of files with LANG=C
- Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 05:56:20 +0000
- In-reply-to: <20060107224447.GA30232@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20060106215829.GG10111@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060107224447.GA30232@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jan 7, 2:44pm, Wayne Davison wrote:
}
} However, I was wondering if it would be nicer to switch both the old and
} the new code over to using a 3-digit octal value in such output? E.g.
} output "\303" instead of "\M-C", and "\201" instead of "\M-^A"?
I prefer the \M- form because it gives you some clue what you should do
to generate the equivalent value from the keyboard. Similarly, I think
the output should continue to resemble that of "bindkey -L".
I wouldn't be hearbroken either way, though.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author