Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Starting replace-string minibuffer in Vi command-mode
- X-seq: zsh-workers 22373
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Starting replace-string minibuffer in Vi command-mode
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:16:36 -0800
- In-reply-to: <EXCHANGE03kP1zJ2amn000012ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <200603192243.k2JMhcqd027578@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <060319202425.ZM5142@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <EXCHANGE03kP1zJ2amn000012ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mar 20, 10:37am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
}
} > Why add a -K option after the widget name rather than allow the widget
} > name to follow the existing -K option and its argument?
}
} Only because of existing practice... options restricted to the widget
} (like -n and -N) have tended to come after it.
Yeah, but -n and -N emulate things the user can pass to the widget with
other ZLE controls, whereas there's no keymap-selection equivalent of
universal-argument.
(I suppose there could be, though. Hmm.)
} I think I marginally prefer the former anyway, unless you have a
} strong preference
I don't.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author